Built for the AI-vendor tail

An autonomous spend agent that audits, reclaims, and renegotiates your stack.

Reclamp runs 24/7 across every license, contract, and renewal in your environment — flagging shadow SaaS, duplicate point tools, and unused seats, then carrying out vendor renegotiations on your behalf. No procurement queue, no human-in-the-loop workflow.

Replaces the 25% one-time recovery rate incumbent SaaS management platforms cite with recurring automated reclaim — across the AI-vendor tail where existing catalogs are still catching up.

Live · Recoverable spend
Tracking 41 contracts
$184,720
Across the next 90 days
Notion
Workspace · 84 seats
Counter-offer drafted
Linear
Standard · 36 seats
Rightsize queued −12 seats
Midjourney
Pro · 14 seats · credits
Benchmark ready
Segment
Team · MTU cap
Renewal in 11d · agent on it
Figma
Org · 60 seats
Shadow seat flagged

Across the corpus

4.1×
lift over the 25% recovery baseline
measured across 90-day windows
11d
mean time to a counter-signed commitment
from open to vendor reply
63%
of wins on AI-vendor lines
the long tail others miss
24/7
autonomous negotiation
no human-in-the-loop queue

Where legacy tools stall

Procurement queues the work. Reclamp does the work.

Catalog platforms were tuned for a thousand well-known vendors and named seats per licence. The long, fast-growing tail of AI-native vendors falls outside that surface — which is exactly where the recoverable spend keeps accumulating.

Shadow SaaS
Duplicate point tools
Unused seats
Mid-cycle price changes
Consumption drift
  1. 01

    Shadow SaaS

    Licenses bought on personal cards, signed for trials, then folded into teams. Catalog tools catch these quarterly at best — Reclamp catches the ones that auto-renew next week.

  2. 02

    Duplicate point tools

    Two diagramming tools, three video editors, four note-takers. Procurement never sees them because each team only owns one. Consolidated against usage evidence, not org-chart rumor.

  3. 03

    Unused seats

    Last-login evidence, not self-declared usage. Reclaim rightsized against a real activity graph, not the seat count on the invoice.

  4. 04

    AI-vendor credits drifting

    Seat-plus-consumption pricing, mid-cycle price changes, credits that expire quarterly and re-up monthly. The exact surfaces classic catalogs are still catching up on.

Autonomous counterparty

Counter-offers, written and signed — without you clicking through a queue.

Where legacy SaaS management platforms — and procurement-led services — still require specialists to drive each conversation, Reclamp operates as an autonomous counterparty. It drafts the counter-offer, surfaces benchmark concessions drawn from a corpus tracking tens of millions of SaaS licenses, and lands the written commitment in your inbox ahead of the renewal deadline.

  • Benchmark concessions

    Comparable deals from the same vendor class, drawn at negotiation time.

  • Tone-matched drafts

    Counter-offers that read like your finance team wrote them, not a bot.

  • Deadline-aware pace

    Calendar-driven urgency: escalates when a vendor stalls past the window.

  • Lightweight queue

    Your team ratifies the draft. Reclamp never sends without sign-off.

Notion · renewal in 11 days
Reclamp · drafting
Drafted from 3 comparable Workspace renewals in the corpus
Heads up: our current Workspace license is 84 seats at $24/mo, billed annually. Last 30 days: 71 distinct active users, 9 in read-only. Reclaiming 13 seats moves us to $1,584/mo before any concession.
Reclamp
Counter: $18/seat annually on a 2-year commit, in exchange for waiving the custom-domain add-on we don't use. Reference rate from comparable mid-market renewals closed Q1.
Reclamp
We can match the seat price but the 2-year commit doesn't move. Could split — 18 months and a ramp?
Acme Inc. (vendor)
Counter: 18 months with a 90-day out. If usage keeps dropping, we re-table. Holding the seat price at $18.
Reclamp

The AI-vendor tail

Catalog coverage falls off as vendors get newer.

Incumbent catalogs were tuned for the workload of the late-2010s SaaS market: named seats, fixed annual terms, a few thousand well-known vendors. The new tail uses credits, seat-plus-consumption pricing, and contracts that quietly auto-renew. Reclamp's corpus tracks that surface specifically.

Catalog detection rate, by vendor
Reclamp vs. incumbent catalogs
Slack
96%
Notion
91%
Figma
88%
Linear
64%
Cursor
38%
v0
22%
Granola
11%

Coverage figures reflect Reclamp corpus v3.2 across active contracts in the last 90 days.

Questions

A few things teams usually want answered.

Get started

One inbox. Reclamp runs from there.

Reach out and we'll wire Reclamp to your finance inbox and contract storage. Target go-live for a mid-sized stack is one week.

Operated by Polsia · Replies within one business day